Kailash Temple, Aurangabad, Maharashtra: Carved from one piece of rock, estimated to have weighed over 4 lakh tonnes, during the reign of Rashtrakuta king Krishna I (Photo: Twitter/@ancient_bharat) |
Kailash
Temple, Aurangabad, Maharashtra: Carved from one piece of rock, estimated to
have weighed over 4,00,000 tonnes during the reign of Rashtrakuta king Krishna
I. (Photo: Twitter/@ancient_bharat)
Three
powerful kingdoms arose in India between 750 and 1000. These were the Pala
kingdom, the Pratihara kingdom and the Rashtrakuta kingdom. Each of these
kingdoms, although they fought among themselves, provided stable conditions of
life over large areas and gave patronage to arts and letters. Of the three, the
Rashtrakuta empire/kingdom lasted the longest. It was not only the most
powerful empire of the time but also acted as a bridge between the North and
the South India in economic as well as cultural matters.
STRUGGLE FOR DOMINATION
Since the
days of Harsha, Kannauj was considered the symbol of sovereignty of North
India. Control over Kannauj also implied control of the upper Gangetic valley
and its rich resources in trade and agriculture. The Palas and the Pratiharas
clashed with each other for the control of area extending from Benaras to
Jharkhand which again had rich natural resources, and well-developed
traditions. The Pratiharas clashed with the Rashtrakutas too.
THE PALAS
The Pala
empire/kingdom was founded by Gopala, in or around 750, when he was elected by
the notable men of the area to end anarchy prevailing there. He was succeeded
by Dharmapala. In spite of having been defeated by Dhruva Rashtrakuta,
Dharmapala occupied Kannauj and held a grand durbar there. It was attended by
vassal rulers from Punjab, eastern Rajasthan etc. However, Dharmapala could not
consolidate his control over Kannauj. Nagabhatta II Pratihara defeated him near
Mongyr (now, Munger).
Bihar and
eastern Uttar Pradesh remained a bone of contention between the Palas and the
Pratiharas. Bihar and Bengal remained, however, under the control of the Palas
for most of the period of their rule.
Failure in
the north compelled the Pala rulers to turn their energies in other directions.
Devapala (810-850), the successor of Dharmapla, extended his control over
Pragjyotishpur (Assam) and parts of Odisha. A part of Nepal probably also came
under the Pala suzerainty.
Thus, for
about a hundred years, the Palas dominated eastern India. Their power is
attested by Arab merchant Sulaiman. He calls the Pala kingdom Ruhma and
testifies that the ruler maintained a large army.
The Tibetan
chronicles also provide some information about the Palas. The Pala rulers were
great patrons of Buddhist learnings and religion. Dharmapala revived the famous
university of Nalanda. He set apart 200 revenue villages for meeting the
expenses of the university. Dharmapala also founded the Vikramshila university,
which stood second only to the Nalanda university in fame.
The Palas
built many viharas in which a large number of Buddhist monks lived. The Pala
rulers had a very close cultural relation with Tibet. The noted Buddhist
scholars, Shantarakshita and Dipankara (also called Atisa) were invited to
Tibet. They introduced a new form of Buddhism there. As a result, many Tibetan
Buddhists flocked to the universities of Nalanda and Vikramshila for education.
The Palas
had close trade contacts with South East Asia. Trade with South East Asia was very
profitable adding immensely to prosperity of the Pala rulers and empire. The
powerful Shailendra dynasty of South East Asia sent an embassy to the Pala
court and sought permission to build a monastery at Nalanda and also requested
the Pala ruler Devapala to endow five villages for its upkeep. The request was
granted. It bears the testimony to a close relationship between the two
empires/countries in the early medieval times.
THE PRATIHARAS
The
Pratiharas are also called the Gurjar-Pratiharas. They are said to have
originated from Gujarat or South West Rajasthan. They were at first possibly
local officials but later able to carve out a series of principalities in
central and eastern Rajasthan. They gained prominence on account of their
resistance to Arab incursions from Sindh into Rajasthan. The efforts of the
early Pratiharas to extend their control over the upper Gangetic valley and
Malwa region were foiled by the Rashtrakuta rulers Dhruva and Gopal III.
The real
founder of the Pratihara empire was Bhoja, who was also the greatest ruler from
the dynasty. Re rebuilt the empire and recovered Kannauj around 836. Kannauj
remained the capital of the empire for almost a century. The name of Bhoja is
famous in many legends. Bhoja was a devotee of Vishnu and adopted the title of
Adivaraha, which has been found inscribed in some of his coins.
Mihir Bhoja
was succeeded by Mahendrapala I, probably in 885. Mahendrapala I maintained the
empire of Bhoja till 908-09 and extended it over Magadha and North Bengal.
Mahendrapala I fought a battle with the king of Kashmir but had to yield to him
some of his territories in Punjab won by Bhoja.
The
Pratiharas, thus, dominated North India for over a hundred years — middle of
the 9th century to the middle of the 10th century. The Arab travellers tell us
that the Pratiharas had the best cavalry in India, having horses imported from
Central Asia. Al Masudi, who visited Gujarat in 915-16, testifies about the
great power and prestige, and vastness of the Pratihara emepire. He calls the
Gurjara-Pratihara kingdom Al Juzr, and identifies Baura (possibly out of
confusion for Bhoja, who had died by that time) as its king.
The
Pratiharas were patrons of learning and literature. The great Sanskrit poet and
dramatist Rajashekhar lived at the court of Mahipala, a grandson of Bhoja. The
Pratiharas also embellished Kannauj with many fine buildings and temples.
Between 915
and 918, Indra III Rashtrakuta attacked Kannauj and devastated the city. This
weakened the Pratihara empire, and possibly also resulted in Gujarat being
passed to the hands of the Rashtrakutas. Al Masudi tells us that the Pratihara
empire had no access to the sea. The loss of Gujarat was a major blow to the
Pratiharas.
Again in
963, Krishna II Rashtrakuta invaded North India and defeated the Pratihara
army. This was followed by rapid dissolution of the Pratihara empire.
THE RASHTRAKUTAS
The dynasty
of the Rashtrakutas produced a long line of warriors and able administration.
The kingdom was founded by Dantidurg, who set up his capital at Manyakhet. The
Rashtrakutas kept fighting with the Pratiharas, the Palas, the Chalukyas of
Vengi, the Pallavas of Kanchi and the Pandyas of Madurai.
Probably,
the greatest rulers of the Rashtrakutas were Govind-III and Amoghvarsha. Govind-III
defeated the Kerala, the Pandyas, the Chola, the Pallava and the western Ganga
kings.
The king of
Lanka and his minister were brought to Halapur. Two statues of the lord of Sri
Lana were carried to Manyakhet and installed like pillars of victory in front
of a Shiva temple.
Amoghvarsha
preferred the pursuit of religion and literature to war. He was himself an
author and credited with writing the first Kannada book on poetics. He was a
great builder. He is said to have built the capital city of Manyakhet to
surpass the glory of the city of Lord Indra. However, there were many
rebellions in the far flung parts of the kingdom during Amoghvarsha’s reign.
These could barely be contained, and began afresh after his death.
Indira-III
re-established the empire. Indra-III was the most powerful king of his times.
Al-Masudi has mentioned about a Rashtrakuta king with name, Balhara or
Vallabharaja as the greatest king of India.
Krishna-III
was the last in the line of brilliant rulers from Rashtrakuta lineage. He pressed
down to Rameshwaram where he set up a pillar of victory. But after his death,
al his opponents united against his successor. In 972, the Rashtrakuta capital
Malkhed was sacked and burnt. This marked the end of the Rashtrakuta rule.
The
Rashtrakuta rulers were tolerant in their religious views and patronised not
only Shaivism and Vaishnavism but also Jainism. The famous rock-cut temple of
Shiva at Ellora was built by Krishna-I in the ninth century.
The
Rashtrakutas allowed Muslim traders to settle, and permitted Islam to be
preached in their dominions. Muslims had their own headmen and held their daily
prayers in large mosques in many of the coastal towns in the Rashtrakuta
empire. This tolerant policy helped to promote foreign trade which enriched the
Rashtrakutas.
The
Rashtrakuta kings were great patrons of art and letter. Their court poets wrote
in Sanskrit, Prakrit and Apabhramsa. The great Apabhramsa poet, Swayambhu
probably lived in the Rashtrakuta court.
POLITICAL IDEAS AND
ORGANISATION
The system
of administration in the three empires was based on the idea and practices of
the Gupta empire, Harsha’s kingdom and the Chalukyan kingdom.
Monarch was
the head of all affairs. He was the head of the administration and the
commander-in-chief of the armed forces. The infantry
and cavalry stationed in his courtyard. Captured war-elephants were
paraded in front of him. He was attended by royal chamberlains, who regulated
the visits of the vassal chiefs, feudatories, ambassadors and other high
officials. The king also dispensed justice. Dancing girls and skilled musicians
also attended the court. Ladies of the king’s household also attended the court
on festive occasions.
The king’s
position was hereditary. Thinkers of the time emphasised absolute loyalty and obedience
to the kings because of the insecurities of the time. However, a contemporary
writer, Medhatithi thought that it was the right of an individual to bear arms
in order to defend oneself against thieves and assassins. He also said that it
was right to oppose an unjust king.
The rules
of succession were not rigidly fixed. Thus, Dhruva and Govinda-IV deposed their
elder brothers. Sometimes, rulers designated the eldest son or another
favourite son as Yuvraj. In that case, Yuvraj stayed at the capital and helped the
king in the task of administration. Younger sons were sometimes appointed as
the provincial governors. Princesses were rarely appointed to government posts
but there is an instance where a Rashtrakuta princess named Chandrobalabbe, a
daughter of Amoghvarsha, administered the Raichur doab region for some time.
Kings were
generally advised by a number of ministers, who were chosen by the king usually
from leading families. Their position was often hereditary. During the Pala
dynasty’s reign, a Brahmana family supplied four successive chief ministers to
Dharamapala and successors.
From
epigraphic and literary records, it appears that in almost every kingdom, there
was a minister, treasurer, chief (senapati) of the armed forces, chief justice
and purohita.
More than
one post was combined in one person. All ministers except Purohita were
expected to lead military campaigns where called upon to do so. There were also
officials of the royal household, Antahpur.
Arab
travellers tell us that the three kingdoms maintained highly efficient military
wings. Elephants were supposed to be the elements of strength and were greatly
prized. The largest number of elephants was maintained by the Pala kings.
A large
number of horses were imported by Rashtrakuta and Pratihara kings by sea from
Arabia and West Asia, and by land from Central Asia. The Pratihara kings are
believed to have had the finest cavalry in the country. There are no references
to war chariots which had fallen out of use.
Some of the
kings, especially the Rashtrakutas had a large number of forts. The infantry
consisted of regular and irregular troops and units provided by vassal chiefs
as levies.
The regular
troops were often hereditary and sometimes drawn from all over India. Thus, the
Pala infantry consisted of soldiers from Malwa, Khasa (Assam), Lata (South
Gujarat) and Karnataka. The Pala kings and perhaps the Rashtrakutas had their
own navies.
The empires
consisted of areas administered directly and regions ruled by vassal chiefs.
The latter were autonomous as far as their internal affairs were concerned and
had a general obligation of loyalty, paying a fixed tribute and supplying a
quota of troops to the overlord. The vassal chiefs were required to attend the
court of the overlord on special occasions and sometimes, they were required to
marry one of their daughters to the overlord to one of his sons.
But the
vassal chiefs always aspired to become independent, and wars were frequently
fought between them and the overlord. Thus, the Rashtrakuta had to fight
constantly against the vassal chiefs of Vengi (Andhra) and Karnataka. The
Pratihars had to fight against the Paramaras of Malwa and the Chandellas of
Bundelkhand.
The
directly administered areas in the Pala and the Pratihara empires were divided
into Bhuktis, and Mandalas or Vishayas. The governor of a province was called
Uparika, and the head of a district Vishayapati.
The Uparika
was expected to collect land revenue and maintain law-and-order with the help
of the army. The Vishayapati was also expected to do the same within his
jurisdiction.
During this
period, there was an increase of smaller chieftains called Samantas or
Bhogapatis who dominated over a number of villages. The Vishyapatis and these
smaller chiefs tended to merge with each other and later on, the word Samanta
began to be used indiscriminately for both of them.
In the
Rashtrakuta kingdom, the directly administered areas were divided into Rashtra
(provinces), Vishayas and Bhuktis. The head of a Rashtra was called the rashtrapati,
and he performed the same functions as the Uparika. The head of a Vishaya here
was called Pattala.
Below these
territorial units was a village, which was the basic unit of administration.
The village administration was carried on by the village headman and the
village accountant whose posts were generally hereditary. They were paid by
grants of rent-free lands.
The headman
was often helped in his duties by the village elder called Grama-Mahajana or
Grama-Mahamattara. In the Rashtrakuta kingdom particularly in Karnataka, there
were village committees to manage local schools, tanks/ponds, temples and
roads. They could also receive money or property in trust and manage them.
These
committees worked in close cooperation with the village headmen and received a
percentage of the revenue collection. Simple disputes were also decided by
these committees.
Towns also
had similar committees to which the heads of the guilds wee also associated.
Law-and-order in the towns and in their immediate locality was the
responsibility f the Koshta-pala in the towns.
(Source: History books and notes from CSE preparation days)