Team India In Rotation

As Team India gear up to face Australia again in the ongoing tri-series on Sunday, I strongly object to the rotation policy once again. I just don't understand the logic of rotation, which is an option, if the players are wearing out. That is not the case here.

Many seasons ago, the then Team India skipper Saurav Ganguly lamented that getting into the national team had become easy for the younger players who took their position for granted. He wanted all the new comers to earn their places and not gifted to them in any way. But, the present set of thinkers in Indian cricket including skipper MS Dhoni seem to believe in some other form of cricketing logic. The bizarre policy of rotation of players from among Sachin Tendulkar, Virender Sehwag and Gautam Gambhir in order to accommodate apparently Rohit Sharma, and perhaps, actually Suresh Raina, a very close friend of MS Dhoni and an important member of the Chennai Super Kings, owned by present BCCI president N Srinivasan. These two players have been given a free hand despite them not contributing to the team's cause for a fairly long period.

I am not in favour of giving either Tendulkar or Sehwag or Gambhir a guaranteed place in the playing eleven overlooking their performance. But, certainly, keeping them in the team in rotation is absurd and also humiliating to them. And, on the top of it, they are being denied a chance to play in order to ensure a place to those who may be dropped from the side on the basis of their performance. Sharma and Raina are still being treated as inexperienced bloke despite the fact that they have been around for a few years. Rohit Sharma has already played more than 75 games and Raina nearly 140. Tendulkar, Sehwag and Gambhir had become proven match winners after similar number of games. People would argue that Sachin took 79 games to score his first ODI century. But, should that matter? He had already become the most potent ODI batsman by then. Sehwag and Gambhir were equally good. Rohit Sharma and Suresh Raina, for that matter, still have to win such faith. Were Tendulkar, Sehwag and Gambhir given such a guarantee of making it to the playing eleven at the expense of any of the proven match winner? No, they earned their position in the team.

It is always preferable to pick the best eleven. If Rohit Sharma or Suresh Raina is talented enough and a certainty for Team India's future, let them perform first, in the games that they happen to play by virtue of their merit. If they are being accommodated today by rotating the most successful openers/players in ODI circuit, how will they manage when Yuvraj Singh returns in the second half of the year, if experts are to be believed? Sachin might have fallen out of ODI scheme of things by then, but can Yuvraj be subjected to the same dropped-by-rotation policy?

The question is easy and the answer is tough. But, the team management need not shy away from taking tough decision. If Rohit Sharma and Suresh Raina suit to the team's requirement more than Tendulkar, Sehwag or Gambhir due to their fielding acumen, then this should be made clear to the players on rotation. Even then, only the best performers among the three should play. Even they don't like to be dropped or accommodated on grounds other than performance. This question will come up with more force as we approach Sunday, because according to the rotation philosophy, Gambhir will be dropped for the game against Australia for 'committing unforced errors while in nervous nineties' in two consecutive matches of his quota.