Thursday, August 17, 2017

Factors of Deforestation in India


Fig Tree. (Photo: MOEF GOI)

India has about 19 per cent of its area under forest while ecologically it should have had not less than 33 per cent of land under forest cover.

Although India is characterised by various types of forests but it is dwindling over a couple of centuries. Recent efforts at afforestation are but an aberration in the general trend of decades.

On an average 1.5 lakh hectare forest was lost every year between 1951 and 1980. The rate of deforestation between 1980 and 1990 was at 55,000 hectare a year while between 1990 and 1995, it stood at 4,500 hectare of 450 sq km.

Recently the rate of deforestation has declined due to two factors –

Some strong punitive measures have been taken to check deforestation.

Due to afforestation programmes, the scale of deforestation has been compensated a bit. In 1996, newly afforested area was equal in expanse to deforested area. Even the afforestation is taking place but the real acreage has been decreasing.

Deforestation is the result of a number of factors:
  
      Agricultural progress – Two types of agricultural practices have been prevalent in India for long. These are shifting agriculture and plantation agriculture. A substantial portion of Indian population has lived in and near forests for centuries. They largely depended on gathering of forest produce to sustain their livelihood.

Now those who had gathering economy have shifted to a more settled economy. The shift in their economic practices necessitated cutting of forests. These people practiced shifting agriculture, which requires fresh and virgin land every few years.

Shifting agriculture proved to be a major factor causing wide-scale deforestation. Finally, this practice was declared illegal with laws like Jhoom Farming Prevention Act, 1976. Though, the practice continued for few more decades as it took lots of persuasion and in sensitizing people living in those areas about the legal and environmental consequences of shifting agriculture.


The effectiveness of the laws is not surmised but it has definitely contributed in slowing down the rate of deforestation. Tribal population growth rate has been very high. Nagaland has showed highest population growth rate for long. Swelling tribal population and need for more dwelling units in their homeland put more and more pressure on forest land which saw vanishing trees.

In the areas where plantation form of agriculture is practiced, deforestation has not much increased in last few decades. Sustained efforts by various governments have ensured that after 1980, plantation area is not increased by cutting down the forests.

After the World War I, tea and other crops brought more areas under plantation acreage in India. In Himachal Pradesh, open forest areas were given to tea plantation even till 1985-86. But, this practice has almost stopped completely.

2.       Fuel wood pressure – A 2015 report by Indiaspend.com said that more than 67 per cent rural households in India depended on firewood or wood chips. It also stated that over 95 per cent rural households in six states – Bihar, Jharkhand, Madhya Pradesh, Odisha, Uttar Pradesh and West Bengal still used traditional fuel such as firewood, dung cakes and agricultural waste for cooking.

According to the Access to Clean Cooking Energy and Electricity Survey of States (ACCESS), only 14 per cent households in rural areas across six states surveyed used biogas, liquefied petroleum gas (LPG), electricity or natural gas as their primary source for cooking.

Another IndiaSpend report said that the use of LPG increased 7.5 times between 1993-94 and 2011-12 in rural areas across India. About 2 per cent rural households used LPG in 1993-94 while about 15 per cent households used LPG in 2011-12.


This overdependence of vast majority of rural India has caused massive cutting of trees from forests – big and small. Many state governments have passed laws to declare cutting of trees for fuel illegal e.g. in Kerala, Garhwal area of Uttarakhand, most of northeastern states and states along Western Ghats.


3.       Resource utilisation pressure – Various industries and economic activities depend on utilisation of forest resources. Forest products are used and trees cut for paper and pulp industry, woodcraft, chemical and drug industries.

The pressure from woodcraft industry is particularly huge in Karnataka, Himachal Pradesh and Jammu and Kashmir. Wooden packing of fruits worked like an industry in itself till 1996 in the country. It was particularly taking toll on forests in the northeast and Himalayan states. The practice has become less intensive in recent years.

Tribal subsistence economy also promotes destruction of forests for resource purposes but they have not been able to make economically competitive use of forests.

The loss is much more in comparison to economic gain. The economic gains from forest dependent industries are short-term while the loss is permanent.

4.       Livestock pressure – Himachal Pradesh and Jammu and Kashmir are among the states which have witnessed serious deforestation on account of livestock pressure. It has caused indirect deforestation.

Trans-Himalayan tribes, as part of their traditional practice, take their livestock towards higher altitudes for grazing purposes during spring. Tall grasses could hardly emerge in the region.

Lack of tall grasses results in an ecological situation where horizon A of the soil is not properly developed. In that situation, the vegetation growth becomes scanty.

Continuous grazing on newly emerged grassy surface causes uprooting of grass which leads to soil erosion reducing the capacity of the soil surface to hold running or rainy water. This leads to deterioration of ground water table which ultimately causes decay of tree vegetation in the region.

5.       Development pressure – River valley projects have caused massive deforestation in India. About 4,97,000 hectare or 4,970 sq km forest was lost to river valley projects in the Himalayan region between 1952 and 1977.

Besides, about 1,27,000 hectare of forest was lost in the Himalayan region for large scale industries and another 57,000 hectare was lost to road construction in the same zone. Deforestation has continued for mining, railways, roadways, airports and helipads in the hilly regions.

Chhotanagpur region of Jharkhand has witnessed massive deforestation due to developmental pressure.

6.       Wild fires – Among other factors for deforestation, wild fires are major contributor. High inflammability of trees – especially the old ones - is one big reason for loss of forest. Collision of trees, branches due to high wind speed during hot summers causes huge wild fires in forests. Western Ghats have witnessed several such fires.

Human errors – forced and unforced, both – are also responsible for forest fires. This is a major cause for destruction of forests in tribal dominated areas. Throwing of untrashed beedis by tribals or cigarettes by tourists and other visitors has led to many wild fires.

It is suspected that such fires were deliberately caused by some people with vested interests. In some cases, terrorists and insurgents have created fires in forests to escape security forces or to serve their own purposes.

1993-94 was a bad year for forests. According to the Forest and Environment Ministry’s data 1,428 incidents of wild fires were reported from Maharashtra in 1993, 644 forest fires in Gujarat, 600 in Himachal Pradesh, 461 in Madhya Pradesh, 418 in Jammu and Kashmir, 258 in Uttar Pradesh, 112 in Kerala and 90 in Tamil Nadu.

 In April-May, 2016 forests of Uttarakhand and Himachal Pradesh kept burning for several weeks. Some 1,600 incidents of fires were reported during the period. Air Force helicopters were pressed into use but did not help much to contain the fire. Finally, heavy rain on May 3 slowed down the fire, which went off after raging for few more days. About 4,048 hectare forest was lost to these fires.

7.        Illegal cutting of trees –Kerala is facing big problem due to cutting of trees on large scale. Problem is not less alarming in Tamil Nadu, Karnataka, Himachal Pradesh, Jammu and Kashmir and the northeastern states. Those who get the contracts for cutting of some trees, are suspecting to be the ones who have ended up damaging the forest the most by overcutting.

8.      Tree cutting by tribals – People living in the forest areas are generally those belonging to tribal groups of the Indian population. They have been cutting trees for various kinds of usage. Though, traditionally, such groups have been very forest-friendly but their age practices have become corrupt. Many have shed the old practice of planting more trees in their neighbourhood while continue to believe that cutting trees from forest is their inherited right.


9.       Population growth – Population growth rate in the hilly regions has been high. So, population pressure has caused damage to forests. Immigration in hilly regions is another reason contributing to population pressure on forests of such areas.

Tuesday, August 15, 2017

Resource Importance of Forests of India


Monkey in forested area of Haridwar
Monkey sitting on the boundary separatist forest area from the city area in Haridwar. (Poor photography by Prabhash K Dutta)

India is among a few countries where all types of vegetation are found. Total enlisted tree species is about 5,000 in India. An estimated number of vegetation plant species is 15,000. Of the 500 tree species, only about 500 types are used – both directly and indirectly - for economic purposes in India. 

A large number of tree species is economically unused and their economic potential is untapped. They are categorised as wild trees. India’s forest resource is vast and diverse. Its share in nation’s GDP is about 4.5 per cent (1999). This shows the backwardness in the context of resource utilisation.
In 1951, forest production in terms of money was Rs 19 crore. In 1992, resource utilisation of forest was valued at Rs 3,800 crore. After 1992, India’s timber production has made rapid growth. India is the fourth (1999) largest timber producer of the world.

Indonesia is the leading producer of timber followed by Brazil and Malaysia. India’s forest-based economy is making progress but even then it is meager. Almost all types of vegetation in India have some economic importance but only a portion is used for economic purposes. (update – United States is the leading producer, followed by India now)

Equatorial forest has bright prospects in economy especially in respect of developing rubber and oil palm plantation. Presently rubber plantation is developed at large scale. India is the fifth largest rubber producer in the world.

In the Northeast India, rubber plantation is being developed under tribal community development schemes. Under monsoonal forest coverage, several social groups of India depend on forest resources. Tribal community’s economy is based on forest.

Vegetation under teak, sal, kendu and khair are put to direct use by tribal population. The largest acreage of teak is found in Madhya Pradesh. Teak is also the costliest tropical tree. Largest exporters and producers of teak, sal and kendu are Myanmar, Vietnam and Malaysia. Teak and sal are used in housing, furniture, railways (also in making sleeper, general bogie seats earlier) and boat making.

Sal is mainly grown in South Asia. Kendu leaves are used in Bidi industry. Large number of tribal communities of Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Odisha, Jharkhand and West Bengal depend on this resource for their livelihood.

Khair’s largest acreage is found in Bihar (including Jharkhand) (1999 figure). It is commonly used as betel leaves in Bihar. Khair also has medicinal value.

Tribal communities in this part of the world are traditionally dependent on various kinds of wood for making umbrella, basket, toys and decorative goods. These items have been sold by the tribals in the local markets for centuries.

Under Integrated Rural Development Programme (IRDP), which is a poverty eradication programme, tribal communities are provided proper training to make better use of leaves of trees like sal and a structured market is made available to them.

In Karnataka, there has been greater use of sandalwood in woodcraft industry where decorative goods are prepared. Sandalwood is used in chemical industry. Wood pieces are also used in various religious pursuits.

Bamboo and savai grass are two other monsoon forest products which are used in paper industry. Over 70 per cent of raw materials of paper industry in India come from bamboo and 15 per cent from savai grass. Thus, 85 per cent (1999 figures) of the raw materials of the paper industry come from monsoonal forest.

There has been indirect importance of forest. Mulberry species are used for domestication of silk worm or cocoon. This is, thus, possible in monsoon forest. Domestication of lac bugs for lac industry is done on mulberry trees. Mainly acacia species are used for lac bug domestication. Even the banyan and peepal trees are used for domestication of lac bugs.

Lac bugs cannot grow where temperature is above 20 degree Celsius and below 12 degree Celsius. So, the conditions are most suitable in south Bihar and Jharkhand, Chhattisgarh and Eastern Madhya Pradesh, Odisha and plateau regions of West Bengal and Karnataka.

Silk worm industry is dependent on deciduous forest. Silk worm industry is found even in Manipur, Assam and Meghalaya. Recently, silk worm domestication is emerging in Kashmir Valley. Mulberry plant is emerging in the Valley region. Among the Indian states, Karnataka is the largest producer of raw silk and silk textile.

China is the world leader in silk production and silk textile followed by India and Japan. In the field of artificial silk, Italy is the largest producer.

Lac production is highest in united Bihar. (1999). The National Research Lac Institute is situated at Namkum near Ranchi. It is the largest collecting and processing centre of lac. India is the largest exporter of lac in the world. India exports 52 per cent of world trade.

Himalayan forest is of high economic value. Siwalik Himalaya is more important economically. Teak, sal, bamboo and savai grass are of more economic use. Siwalik Himalayas is dense in comparison to other Himalayan forests.

Another advantage is that it is of low altitude, so its economic use is possible. In fact, forest-based economy has developed in Siwalik Himalaya region especially in Garhwal area of Uttarakhand, Himachal Pradesh and Jammu and Kashmir. In these regions, wood craft industry is developed.

Lesser Himalaya and the lower slope of the Greater Himalaya are characterised by temperate and taiga woods. They are of economic use. Deodar covers 5.80 lakh square kilometers and largest acreage is found in Jammu and Kashmir. Pine acreage in Jammu and Kashmir is about 7,380 sq km. (all figures to be verified).

Both deodar and pine are used in paper and woodcraft industries. Other species of economic use are silver fur, blue pine and spruce. Spruce is used in paper industry. Greater and Lesser Himalayas forest resources are nearly unused and they have tremendous prospects of development. Sustainable development strategy may help in the proper utilisation of Himalayan forest.

Coastal forest in India is also of great economic value. Only mangrove is not of much economic use. Three important tree species – coconut, palm and cane are of much value.

India is the largest producer of coconut. What is required is to develop coconut-based industries. Coir-based, copra-based industries should also be developed using raw materials from coconut forest.
In Tamil Nadu, there is tremendous prospect to develop palm oil industry. Cane is used for making fishing boats.

India’s sub-tropical and arid regions’ vegetation types are yet to be properly surveyed from the resource point of view but cactus species are being recognized as the potential raw material for various chemical and drug industries.

Date palm is another prospective vegetation for economic use. Iraq and Iran produce sugar from date palm. Date palm vegetation may be developed as a raw material for sugar industry.

Acacia has also chemical and drug related significance. They may be used for domestication of new 
varieties of lac bugs. They are plants of quick growth and can be used for fuel (where LPG transportability is difficult for rough and undulating terrain) and fodder purposes.


It is obvious that the forest resource of India keeps bright prospect for future development. Presently, it is in under-developed situation.  It may be developed as an alternative economy for tribal and rural people. Several raw materials may be collected from the forest. What is required is to prepare a sustainable national policy for the development of forest resources.

Distribution of Forests in India

Forests are important for all forms of lives. (Photo: Prabhash K Dutta | New Delhi)

Total forest area in India is 64.01 million hectares – about 19 per cent of Indian territory (1999 figure).

Dense forest - 11 per cent
Open forest – 8 per cent. Grazing is permitted in an open forest.
Mangrove forest – 0.15 per cent

Indian forest is only 1.85 per cent of the total forest cover of the world. India has about 2.4 per cent of the total area and over 16 per cent of world’s population.

Under the existing policy of the government, 33 per cent of India should be under forest cover. Even the law of 33 per cent forest cover is not application in all parts of the country. Ideally, 60 per cent of the mountainous and plateau regions should be under forest cover while 20 per cent of the plain regions should have forest cover.

Distribution of forest in India is highly uneven. Maximum forest coverage is found in Andaman and Nicobar Islands. As per 1994, 92 per cent of the total area in Andaman and Nicobar Islands was under the forest cover.

Mizoram had 88.7 per cent, Nagaland 86.5 per cent, Arunachal Pradesh 82 per cent, Manipur 78.9 per cent and Meghalaya had 70.3 per cent forest cover. (Data till 1999) These are the mountainous and hilly states and have above 60 per cent of area under forest cover.

At the other hand, forest coverage is below the required 60 per cent despite being mountainous regions. Examples are two-third of Tripura is mountainous region but has corresponding forest cover is only 52 .8 per cent. In the case of Sikkim, the entire state is mountainous but the forest cover is only 44.4 per cent.

Other states and union territories where forest cover is above national average are as follows:

Dadar and Nagar Haveli – 42 per cent
Goa + Daman and Diu – 36.2 per cent
Assam – 31.2 per cent
Madhya Pradesh + Chhattisgarh – 30.5 per cent
Odisha – 30.3 per cent
Kerala – 26.5 per cent
Himachal Pradesh – 23.7 per cent

There are six states where the forest cover is below the national average but above 10 per cent. These states are as follows:

Andhra Pradesh + Telangana – 17.2 per cent
Karnataka – 16.9 per cent
Bihar + Jharkhand – 15.3 per cent
Maharashtra – 14.3 per cent
Tamil Nadu – 13.6 per cent
Uttar Pradesh – 11.5 per cent

Remaining states and union territories have less than 10 per cent forest cover. These states’ forest cover is given below:

West Bengal – 9.2 per cent
Jammu and Kashmir – 9.2 per cent
Gujarat – 6.1 per cent
Chandigarh – 4.4 per cent
Rajasthan - 3.8 per cent
Punjab - 2.7 per cent
Delhi – 1.5 per cent
Haryana – 1.2 per cent

Going by the forest cover, Northwest India can easily be called the Yellow Region of the country. Punjab and Haryana are almost treeless states.

There has been intra-regional variation in the distribution of forest. Such variation is more prominent in Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, West Bengal, Assam, Odisha, Andhra Pradesh have regions of different topography and consequently the plain areas have very low percentage of forest cover, very much like states of lower average state.

Many districts of Bihar and Uttar Pradesh where forest is below one per cent but Chhotanagpur of Jharkhand and Uttarakhand have higher forest cover. When Jharkhand was part of Bihar then it was a huge contrast to compare the forest cover of Chhotanagpur region and the rest of united Bihar.

While united Bihar’s average forest cover was 15.3 per cent while that of Chhotanagpur was 27 per cent. Same was the case in united Uttar Pradesh, which had an average forest cover of 11.5 per cent with eastern districts bordering Bihar had less than one per cent while Garhwal district had over 40 per cent of forest cover.


It is obvious that the distribution is characterised by inter-regional and intra-regional variations.